Wonderlick v. State
Wonderlick v. State
651 So. 2d 822; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2559; 1995 WL 106309
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wonderlick v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions, and the lifetime revocation of his driver’s license. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla. 1994); State v. Wright, 546 So.2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Onesky v. State, 544 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). However, because the parties operated under a misapprehension of the law as to the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, the affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a motion to withdraw his plea or a rule 3.850 motion. See Gainer v. State, 590 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.