V.M.B. v. State
V.M.B. v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant raises two issues on appeal, arguing that the trial court erred (1) by imposing attorney’s fees against the parents of an adjudicated juvenile, and (2) by imposing statutorily mandated costs against the parents. We find no merit in the argument of error in regard to statutorily mandated costs. See Rhodes v. State, 580 So.2d 159 (Fla. 1991). We do, however, find that the court failed to give the appellant adequate notice of her right to a hearing to contest the amount assessed for the assistance of the public defender as required by
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.