Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 12, 1995 · Cope, Hubbart, Jorgenson
652 So. 2d 990; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3662; 1995 WL 170411 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smith v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his 3.850 motion. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the order and remand with directions to correct the defendant’s sentencing order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. See Gamble v. State, 643 So.2d 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (written sentencing order must conform to trial court’s oral pronouncement); White v. State, 624 So.2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (same). In this case, the trial court clearly pronounced that the six-year sentence imposed in Case Number 92-34785 is to run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Case Number 91-5298A. We affirm the sentence in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.