Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. Florescue & Andrews Investments, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sarah Alhassid v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC (11th Cir. 2017)
- Phenion Development Group, Inc. v. Love (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Brink Distributors, Inc. v. J. Evans Associates, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We find no error in any of the issues raised by Appellant, Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (“Mercedes”). We agree, however, with Florescue & Andrews’ contention on cross-appeal that it is entitled to recover prejudgment interest from the date the debt was liquidated by the lower court’s judgment.
Although unstated in the court’s order, the parties appear to agree that the lower court concluded Florescue & Andrews waived its prejudgment interest claim. We believe that the circumstances presented in the record
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
. Tillman v. Howell, 634 So.2d 268, 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Getelman v. Levey, 481 So.2d 1236, 1240-41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1986).
. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212, 215 (Fla. 1985).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.