Freeman v. State
Freeman v. State
653 So. 2d 1151; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5043; 1995 WL 270931
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Freeman v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially.
I concur in the affirmance of appellant’s conviction and sentence because the only issue raised by the appellant’s counsel was whether the trial court erred in imposing restitution without considering the defendant’s financial resources. Based upon the appellant’s failure to object to the restitution at trial, he waived his right to challenge it on appeal. Thus, affirmance on this issue is appropriate.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.