Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Grudzinski v. Voyer

Grudzinski v. Voyer
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 19, 1995 · Cobb, Dauksch, Goshorn
654 So. 2d 675; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413; 1995 WL 302336 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Grudzinski v. Voyer

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Debrah Grudzinski appeals a nonfinal order denying her petition to intervene in the child custody modification proceeding involving her grandchild. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari,1 and, finding no abuse of discretion, deny the petition. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230; John G. Grubbs, Inc. v. Suncoast Excavating, Inc., 594 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (stating that intervention is not a matter of right, but rests within the trial court’s discretion).

PETITION DENIED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

. Chriss v. Chriss, 417 So.2d 835, 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (nonfinal order denying motion to intervene reviewable by way of common law certiorari).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.