Ollins v. State
Ollins v. State
654 So. 2d 1278; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409; 1995 WL 302310
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ollins v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant, James Allen Ollins, appeals multiple judgments and sentences. In cases CF 93-2215, CF 93-1723, CF 91-0359, CF 91-0836, CF 91-5932 and CF 91-2922, we modify probation conditions three and five. We affirm the portion of condition three which prohibits possessing, carrying or owning a firearm and strike the remainder of the condition. Fitts v. State, 649 So.2d 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We strike the first sentence of condition five and affirm the second sentence. Emond v. State, 652 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA March 15, 1995). In all other respects, the defendant’s judgments and sentences are affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.