Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Brooks v. State

Brooks v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 6, 1995 · Mickle, Nortwick, Webster
655 So. 2d 238; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6009; 1995 WL 331470 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Brooks v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MICKLE, J.

Appellant claims that the trial court imper-missibly ordered restitution upon resentenc-ing following remand from this court, where no restitution was imposed at the original sentencing. We agree and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the order of restitution. See Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied 591 So.2d 184 (Fla. 1991); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.