Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Shuda v. Shuda

Shuda v. Shuda
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 5, 1995 · Glickstein, Stone, Warner
656 So. 2d 971; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7280; 1995 WL 390273 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Shuda v. Shuda

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the contempt order herein except for the portion imposing incarceration which we reverse. On remand, the trial court has three options: (1) criminal contempt proceedings as recommended by the general master; (2) further proceedings for *972civil contempt to show proof of present ability to pay the purge amount; and (3) a non-incarcerative remedy such as those outlined in Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). We urge the trial court on remand to make part of the record the prior history of proceedings involving these parties, because this court has been limited in its review by the lack of a complete record of what has transpired heretofore.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.