Nembhard v. State
Nembhard v. State
657 So. 2d 971; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8041; 1995 WL 437391
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nembhard v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant’s motions for mistrial where the impermissible testimony was harmless in light of the other overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.