Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Cubilete v. State

Cubilete v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 25, 1995 · Blue, Danahy, Parker
659 So. 2d 482; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9014; 1995 WL 502165 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cubilete v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Alexander D. Cubilete appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft. We affirm the conviction but strike certain probation conditions and costs that were not properly imposed.

Because they were not pronounced at sentencing, we strike the special conditions found in probation conditions four and seven. See Hamilton v. State, 658 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We strike $2 in court costs imposed pursuant to section 948.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because this cost is discretionary but was not orally announced at sentencing; we also strike $215 for the court improvement fund. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc).

Convictions affirmed; certain probation conditions and costs stricken.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.