Cohen v. Cohen
Cohen v. Cohen
661 So. 2d 123; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10483; 1995 WL 584225
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cohen v. Cohen
Opinion of the Court
Based upon our examination of the record and argument of counsel, we agree with the husband that the trial court erred in requiring the husband to pay all of the prospective Hillel education costs for the children. Instead, the trial court should have held each party responsible for payment of one-half the costs thereof. The other points are not preserved or are without merit.
Affirmed in part, and reversed in part, and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.