Huggins v. State
Huggins v. State
661 So. 2d 1311; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430; 1995 WL 638322
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We find no error in the order denying the appellant’s 3.850 motion, except that we find that the three-year minimum-mandatory sentences as to Counts II and III are to be served concurrent to each other and consecutive to Count I, and do hereby modify said sentences in this regard. In all other respects the order under review is affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.