Meenan v. Newman

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Meenan v. Newman, 662 So. 2d 1320 (1995)
1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425; 1995 WL 638288
Goderich, Nesbitt, Schwartz

Meenan v. Newman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order of reference to a special master without consent of opposing parties was explicitly contrary to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). For this reason, prohibition is granted so as to prevent respondents from further enforcing the order of reference. Moreover, we grant mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine the matters encompassed in the order of reference. Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We assume issuance of a formal writ will not be necessary.

Relief awarded.

Reference

Full Case Name
William D. MEENAN, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jean Rich-Meenan and George Batchelor v. Robert H. NEWMAN, as Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Linda Harrington, David Rich, Stephen John Meenan and Michael Rich-Meenan
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published