Dobrowolski v. State
Dobrowolski v. State
663 So. 2d 678; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12585; 1995 WL 700146
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dobrowolski v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction. We also affirm appellant’s sentence, except we reverse that part of the probation order that required appellant to “submit to urinalysis, breathalyzer or blood tests at any time requested by [her] Officer.” Although the trial court did pronounce in open court the requirement to submit to urinalysis, it did not include pronouncement of breathalyzer or
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.