Weinstock v. City of Plantation

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Weinstock v. City of Plantation, 664 So. 2d 66 (1995)
1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12715; 1995 WL 733316
Glickstein, Shahood, Warner

Weinstock v. City of Plantation

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mark WEINSTOCK v. CITY OF PLANTATION
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published