Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

State v. Acosta

State v. Acosta
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 1, 1995 · Hersey, Klein, Warner
664 So. 2d 967; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 645; 1995 WL 36155 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Acosta

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed this case after concluding that a statutory provision under which defendant was charged was facially unconstitutional. In a companion case, State v. Marcolini, 664 So.2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) we determined that the same provision was facially constitutional. We therefore reverse this case for the reasons expressed in Marcolini.

HERSEY, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.