Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Lupton v. State

Lupton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 1, 1995 · Altenbernd, Parker, Quince
664 So. 2d 1070; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12457; 1995 WL 704974 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lupton v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Edwin Lupton argues the trial court erred in revoking his probation for failing to appear for a urinalysis test. We affirm the revocation because there was competent evidence that Lupton willfully failed to appear for the test. However, we remand this ease to the trial court to correct the judgment and sentence by deleting the statement that the defendant “admitted guilt.” In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.