Calfee v. Pratt & Whitney
Calfee v. Pratt & Whitney
667 So. 2d 392; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12471; 1995 WL 710197
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
The record contains competent, substantial evidence to support the Judge of Compensation Claims’s determination that Claimant’s medical problems were not attributable to a reaction to the tetanus toxoid injection. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review without reaching Claimant’s second point regarding the statute of limitations issue.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.