Calfee v. Pratt & Whitney
Calfee v. Pratt & Whitney
667 So. 2d 392; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12471; 1995 WL 710197
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Calfee v. Pratt & Whitney
Opinion of the Court
The record contains competent, substantial evidence to support the Judge of Compensation Claims’s determination that Claimant’s medical problems were not attributable to a reaction to the tetanus toxoid injection. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review without reaching Claimant’s second point regarding the statute of limitations issue.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.