Vo v. Bui
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Asteberg v. Russell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
- In re GD (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- L.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Olges v. Dougherty (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Bang Thi VO, Appellant,
v.
Trung Quang BUI, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Donald R. Gillette, Tampa, for Appellant.
Nina M. Hanson and Catherine W. Real of Muga & Real, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order in this case, requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation, is not an appealable nonfinal order. See Pariser v. Pariser, 601 So.2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the alleged harm will not be remediable on appeal, we treat the instant case as a petition for writ of certiorari. Pariser. We conclude that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law; therefore, we deny the writ. See Elder v. Carter, 670 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.