Godwin v. State
Godwin v. State
679 So. 2d 362; 1996 WL 515287
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Godwin v. State
Opinion
Tess L. GODWIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Tess L. Godwin, Lowell, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
*363 PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the summary denial of her 3.800 motion to correct sentence. Defendant asserts in the 3.800 motion that the trial court entered a departure sentence without providing written reasons. This sentencing error must be raised on direct appeal, and it is not cognizable in a post-conviction motion. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
COBB, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.