Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Bloodworth v. State

Bloodworth v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 1, 1996 · Per Curiam
672 So. 2d 56; 1996 WL 143610 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bloodworth v. State

Opinion

672 So.2d 56 (1996)

Frederick BLOODWORTH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-2488.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 1, 1996.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 1996.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Frederick Bloodworth, pro se, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation and the sentence imposed thereon, but direct the trial court, on remand, to enter a written revocation order setting forth the conditions of probation which appellant was found to have violated. See McQuitter v. State, 622 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (when trial court orally pronounces conditions of which probationer has been found in violation, but fails to place them in written form, remand is necessary for entry of order conforming to oral pronouncement).

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑