Massengale v. Ray

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Massengale v. Ray, 665 So. 2d 1152 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 97; 1996 WL 8248
Goderich, Nesbitt, Schwartz

Massengale v. Ray

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because Ray’s third-party complaint did not allege a claim for either indemnification, subrogation or contribution, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse. See Rupp v. Philpot, 619 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Reference

Full Case Name
Jack MASSENGALE v. Michael D. RAY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published