Judd v. State
Judd v. State
666 So. 2d 237; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 57; 1996 WL 1149
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Judd v. State
Opinion of the Court
Danny Dale Judd appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The only claim that merits discussion concerns Judd’s allegation that he is entitled to credit pursuant to State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla. 1989). The trial court’s order failed to address this issue. If this allegation is true, Judd may be entitled to relief.
Accordingly, we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, then it must attach portions of the record that refute Judd’s claim. See Clingenpeel v. State, 610 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.