Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Klug v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 13, 1996 · No. 95-1909 · Lawrence, Mickle, Webster

667 So. 2d 956; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1386; 1996 WL 60512 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Burch v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Bailey v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed and we also find no error preserved for our review with regard to the restitution as ordered. We remand, however, for the deletion of cost awards and the 4% surcharge as being unsupported by authority. See McCray v. State, 665 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st *957DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 665 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may enter a written order reimposing some or all of these charges so long as specific statutory authority is provided for them.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.