Colasante v. Nash
Colasante v. Nash
670 So. 2d 1078; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2822
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Colasante v. Nash
Opinion of the Court
The parties raise numerous issues on appeal and cross appeal. We find that the trial court did an excellent job in handling a difficult and complicated case. We find only one error: The trial court failed to award prejudgment interest as to the birth expenses which were awarded. Mason v. Reiter, 564 So.2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). We, therefore, remand for the award of prejudgment interest. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.