Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Colasante v. Nash

Colasante v. Nash
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 20, 1996 · Benton, Joanos, Wolf
670 So. 2d 1078; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2822 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Colasante v. Nash

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The parties raise numerous issues on appeal and cross appeal. We find that the trial court did an excellent job in handling a difficult and complicated case. We find only one error: The trial court failed to award prejudgment interest as to the birth expenses which were awarded. Mason v. Reiter, 564 So.2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). We, therefore, remand for the award of prejudgment interest. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

JOANOS, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.