Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Tutt v. State

Tutt v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 29, 1996 · Quince, Schoonover, Whatley
670 So. 2d 1132; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3280; 1996 WL 139514 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tutt v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Cordell Tutt appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s denial in all re*1133spects, except one. We remand for consideration of Tutt’s claim that his consecutive sentences as a violent habitual felony offender are illegal under Hale v. State 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), and Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), approved, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995).

Appellant must seek review of any subsequent order of the trial court within thirty days.

Reversed and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.