Dyson v. State
Dyson v. State
Opinion of the Court
After a jury trial, Dyson was adjudicated guilty of robbery with a firearm
Finding no error in this case, we affirm in all respects except for the imposition of a $500.00 publie defender’s lien. The record discloses it was imposed without apprising Dyson of his right to challenge the amount, in violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. 3.720(d)(1). Pursuant to Fontenont v. State, 631 So.2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), the lien must be stricken without prejudice to its reimposition, after compliance with the rule.
AFFIRMED in part; Lien STRICKEN; REMANDED.
. § 812.13(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1995).
. § 790.22, Fla.Stat. (1995).
.§ 790.23, Fla.Stat. (1995).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.