Marshall Roofing, Inc. v. Gumberg
Marshall Roofing, Inc. v. Gumberg
671 So. 2d 814; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2840; 1996 WL 124712
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Marshall Roofing, Inc. v. Gumberg
Opinion of the Court
The pleadings, depositions and affidavits in the record reveal a genuine issue of material fact as to the intention of the subject agreement; namely, whether appellant was contingently to receive monies pursuant to the agreement in addition to the monies being sought by it through its cross-claim. To this extent we reverse the final judgment and remand for non-jury trial of the issue.
We note, however, that on remand, the question of whether appellant was entitled to a reimbursement of insurance premiums is not to be considered, as this issue was not raised by the pleadings or by the parties.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.