Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. American Medical Express Corp.

Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. American Medical Express Corp.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 3, 1996 · Goderich, Green, Schwartz
671 So. 2d 819; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. American Medical Express Corp.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We hold that the trial court properly vacated a garnishment judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(5)1 because the underlying debt owed by the garnishee to the plaintiff-garnishor’s judgment debtor had been fully satisfied. See § 77.083, Fla.Stat. (1995); First Florida Bank, N.A v. R.D.P. of Naples, Inc., 573 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 2d DCA *8201991); Carpenter v. Benson, 478 So.2d 353 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1986); United Presidential Life Ins. Co. v. King, 361 So.2d 710 (Fla. 1978). See generally Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Davis, 629 So.2d 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Weitzman v. F.I.F.. Consultants, Inc., 468 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 479 So.2d 117 (Fla. 1985). On the cross-appeal, we likewise find no error.

Affirmed.

. RULE 1.540 RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, DECREES, OR ORDERS

* * * * * *

(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud; etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, decree, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:

* * * * * *

(5) that the judgment or decree has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment or decree upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment or decree should have prospective application.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.