Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Koehring Co. v. Spaniola

Koehring Co. v. Spaniola
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 27, 1996 · Dell, Farmer, Glickstein
672 So. 2d 854; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3257; 1996 WL 135515 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Koehring Co. v. Spaniola

Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s failure to tax the cost of the deposition of the witness Hargreaves. From our review of the record, we conclude that the Hargreaves deposition was reasonably necessary in supporting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the statute of repose.

*855In all other respects, however, we affirm the order on defendants’ motion to tax costs.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.