Lamberto v. Artime
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Lamberto v. Artime, 672 So. 2d 886 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4559; 1996 WL 210867
Goderich, Levy, Schwartz
Lamberto v. Artime
Opinion of the Court
The judgment for the appellee-plaintiff under review is reversed because no good cause — by way of cognizable non-record activity or otherwise — was demonstrated to justify the failure of the predecessor trial judge to dismiss the case under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) after a period of more than one year had elapsed without record activity. Public Health Trust v. Diaz, 529 So.2d 682 (Fla. 1988); Tosar v. Sladek, 393 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); F.M.C. Corp. v. Chatman, 368 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1979); Dade County v. Moreno, 227 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bruce LAMBERTO v. George ARTIME
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published