Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Lamberto v. Artime

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 1, 1996 · No. 95-1474 · Goderich, Levy, Schwartz

672 So. 2d 886; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4559; 1996 WL 210867 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Artime v. Brotman (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment for the appellee-plaintiff under review is reversed because no good cause — by way of cognizable non-record activity or otherwise — was demonstrated to justify the failure of the predecessor trial judge to dismiss the case under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) after a period of more than one year had elapsed without record activity. Public Health Trust v. Diaz, 529 So.2d 682 (Fla. 1988); Tosar v. Sladek, 393 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); F.M.C. Corp. v. Chatman, 368 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1979); Dade County v. Moreno, 227 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.