Summerlin v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Summerlin v. State, 673 So. 2d 558 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438; 1996 WL 263410
Mickle, Miner, Webster

Summerlin v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion on the merits. “[W]hen the denial is not predicated on the legal insufficiency of the motion on its face, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the order.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). Because no portion of the record is attached to the trial court’s order, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court either attach that portion of the record which conclusively shows that appellant is entitled to no relief, or take other appropriate action, as contemplated by rule 3.850(d).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Keith Edward SUMMERLIN v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published