Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Hunt v. State

Hunt v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 24, 1996 · Cobb, Dauksch, Griffin
673 So. 2d 969; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5456; 1996 WL 273721 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hunt v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. We do not consider the ineffective assistance of counsel argument, and make no determination on the merits thereof, since we believe that such argument in this case would be more appropriately addressed in collateral proceedings under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.