Hunt v. State
Hunt v. State
673 So. 2d 969; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5456; 1996 WL 273721
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hunt v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. We do not consider the ineffective assistance of counsel argument, and make no determination on the merits thereof, since we believe that such argument in this case would be more appropriately addressed in collateral proceedings under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.