Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Rosemurgy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 29, 1996 · No. 95-1913 · Farmer, Gunther, Warner

673 So. 2d 989; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5513; 1996 WL 280023 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Rosemurgy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (Fla. 1996)
PARADISE PLAZA v. Reinsurance Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Paradise Plaza Condominium Ass'n v. Reinsurance Corp. of New York (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a trial court order dismissing his amended complaint and directing the parties to appraisal pursuant to an appraisal provision in State Farm’s insurance policy. We affirm and align ourselves with the reasoning expressed by the first district in Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Desalvo, 666 So.2d 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, we certify conflict with State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Liceo, 649 So.2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. granted, 662 So.2d 933 (Fla. 1995), Gables Court Professional Centre, Inc. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 642 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. dismissed, 650 So.2d 990 (Fla. 1994), Robles v. Harco National Insurance Co., 669 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev. granted, 667 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1996), and American Reliance Insurance Co. v. Village Homes at Country Walk, 632 So.2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 640 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.