Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Goff v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 29, 1996 · No. 96-0717 · Glickstein, Gross, Stone

673 So. 2d 990; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5523; 1996 WL 280028 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Troya v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Thomas v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987 within thirty days. See Weisman v. State, 651 So.2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

The motion in this case does not appear to be facially defective, but for the absence of verification, in its allegations with respect to appellant’s plea agreement, counsel’s representations to the court with respect to same and counsel’s calculations as to sentence.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.