Goff v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Goff v. State, 673 So. 2d 990 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5523; 1996 WL 280028
Glickstein, Gross, Stone

Goff v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987 within thirty days. See Weisman v. State, 651 So.2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

The motion in this case does not appear to be facially defective, but for the absence of verification, in its allegations with respect to appellant’s plea agreement, counsel’s representations to the court with respect to same and counsel’s calculations as to sentence.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kenneth G. GOFF v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published