Callaway v. City of West Palm Beach

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Callaway v. City of West Palm Beach, 674 So. 2d 921 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5909; 1996 WL 295054
Dell, Kahn, Martin, Stone

Callaway v. City of West Palm Beach

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, successful in its defense, was awarded attorney’s fees in consolidated cases. The law governing the lawsuits permitted the successful litigant the award of fees. Although the plaintiff made an appropriate demand, the defendant did not. The failure of the defendant to plead entitlement to attorney’s fees precludes the award. Stockman v. Downs, 573 So.2d 835 (Fla. 1991).

Although one of the cases here involved a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, which might otherwise allow for attorney’s fees even though not requested until after judgment, see White v. New Hampshire Dept. of Employment Sec., 455 U.S. 445, 102 S.Ct. 1162, 71 L.Ed.2d 325 (1982), Florida procedure applies here. Under Florida procedure, Stockman is controlling.

REVERSED.

DELL and STONE, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Donald G. CALLAWAY v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, a municipal corporation, and West Palm Beach Golf Commission, an agency of the City of West Palm Beach
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published