Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Lee v. State

Lee v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 19, 1996 · Allen, Mickle, Miner
675 So. 2d 682; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6504; 1996 WL 332927 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lee v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the state concedes, that his guidelines sentence for armed sexual battery and armed burglary is based upon an error in the scoring of a prior Geor*683gia burglary offense on his guidelines score-sheet. Specifically, the Georgia burglary was scored as a second-degree felony on the theory that the burglarized structure was a dwelling. However, as the record reveals and the state concedes, the Georgia statute does not recognize such a distinction and does not contain a separate element requiring that the burglarized structure be a dwelling. In Dautel v. State, 658 So.2d 88 (Fla. 1995), the supreme court held that only the elements of the out-of-state crime, and not the underlying facts, should be considered in determining the degree of the analogous Florida offense on a guidelines seoresheet. Consequently, the Georgia offense must be scored as a third-degree felony.

Accordingly, we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand the case for resentencing, with instructions to score the Georgia offense as a third-degree felony.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.