Pearce v. Publix Supermarkets

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Pearce v. Publix Supermarkets, 675 So. 2d 710 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6772; 1996 WL 347129
Barkdull, Green, Levy

Pearce v. Publix Supermarkets

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in this slip and fall action where the record discloses a genuine triable issue of a material fact as to whether the alleged dangerous condition existed for a sufficient length of time so as to place the appellee on constructive notice thereof in exercise of ordinary care or that the condition occurred with sufficient regularity so as to be foreseeable. Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., 281 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 1973); Dale v. ITT Sheraton Corp., 611 So.2d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Brooks v. Phillip Watts Enters., Inc., 560 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 567 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1990); Nance v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 436 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1984).

Reference

Full Case Name
Sandra PEARCE and John Pearce, Her Husband v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, a Florida Corporation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published