Hardy v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Hardy v. State, 677 So. 2d 104 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873; 1996 WL 417531
Cobb, Harris, Sharp

Hardy v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence, but strike the public defender’s fee, as the record fails to show that appellant was advised of his right to object to the amount as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See also Palmer v. State, 664 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the fee after compliance with the rule. We also note that the sentence form was not checked to indicate appellant was sentenced as an habitual felony offender and remand to correct this scrivener’s error.

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; REMANDED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR.

COBB, W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hayward HARDY v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published