Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

S.P. v. State

S.P. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 31, 1996 · Barkdull, Cope, Nesbitt
677 So. 2d 109; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8053; 1996 WL 426374 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

S.P. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions for armed robbery and armed burglary, finding no merit in the argument raised on appeal. However, as the state concedes error, we reverse and remand in order to permit the trial court to specify in its disposition order the offense or offenses which it determined the juvenile to have committed pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.110(i).

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part with directions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.