Davidson v. State
Davidson v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment and sentence and the order of community control in this Anders
Davidson also argues that her plea was not intelligently and voluntarily entered because she was under the influence of psychotropic medication when she entered the plea. This argument is not cognizable on appeal because Davidson did not file a motion to withdraw her plea in the trial court. Byrd v. State, 419 So.2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). Further, her allegations are unsworn. Davidson may allege involuntariness of plea in a properly sworn Rule 3.850 motion filed in the trial court.
Judgment and Sentence AFFIRMED; Public Defender fee STRICKEN; REMANDED.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.