Joiner v. State
Joiner v. State
Opinion of the Court
Joiner appeals from his convictions and sentences for first degree murder
The record established that Detective Grenhalg interviewed Joiner at the Sheriffs Department after his arrest. Joiner was given Miranda warnings, and the detective explained that an attorney would be appointed for him at arraignment. Joiner gave a full verbal confession.
Detective Grenhalg began helping him prepare his written statement. At that point in the process, Joiner told her that he had dreamt about killing the victim. He remarked that his lawyer would get mad at him for making that statement.
We do not think Joiner’s comment that his lawyer would be “mad at him” rises to even an “equivocal” request for counsel.
AFFIRMED,
. § 782.04(l)(a)l, Fla. Stat. (1993).
. § 812.014(1) and (2), Fla. Stat. (1993).
. The specific statement was "my attorney will kill me.”
. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994); Deck v. State, 653 So.2d 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). See also People v, Wheeler, 226 Ill.App.3d 1092, 168 Ill.Dec. 915, 590 N.E.2d 552 (Ill.App.2d Dist. 1992); State v. Helewa, 223 N.J.Super. 40, 537 A.2d 1328 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1988).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.