Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Reynolds v. Singletary

Reynolds v. Singletary
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 12, 1996 · Allen, Mickle, Miner
677 So. 2d 988; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8492; 1996 WL 449518 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Reynolds v. Singletary

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus was denied for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Appellee files a motion to relinquish jurisdiction asserting that it has determined that appellant did, in fact, exhaust his administrative remedies. Appellee submits that this court should relinquish jurisdiction to allow the trial court to consider the merits of the petition. We elect to construe appellee’s motion to relinquish jurisdiction as a confession of error. This cause is REVERSED and REMANDED to the trial court to consider the merits of appellant’s claims.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.