Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 12, 1996 · Goderich, Green, Jorgenson

678 So. 2d 368; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6310 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the insurer, Allianz Insurance Company, failed to comply with the annual notice requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991),1 we find that the trial court properly held that the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is equal to the liability limits set forth in the policy. See Patterson v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 564 So.2d 1149, 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Ruiz v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 441 So.2d 681 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm the orders under review.

Affirmed.

. Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991), provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

The insurer shall notify the named insured at least annually of his options as to the coverage required by this section. Such notice shall be part of, and attached to, the notice of premium, shall provide for a means to allow the insured to request such coverage, and shall be given in a manner approved by the department.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.