Mardy v. State
Mardy v. State
678 So. 2d 451; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8334; 1996 WL 447406
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Mardy v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Jean Mardy, challenges his judgment and sentence for armed robbery. We find merit only in his contention that that portion of probation condition (8), which requires him to pay for random drug and alcohol testing, was improperly imposed because it was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Since the payment provision of condition (8) is a special condition which required oral pronouncement, we strike only that portion of condition (8) which relates to payment. Mardy’s judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.
Accordingly, the instant cause is affirmed in part and stricken in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.