Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Roadruck v. Roadruck

Roadruck v. Roadruck
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 7, 1996 · Ryder, Threadgill, Whatley
679 So. 2d 5; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6037; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1349 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Roadruck v. Roadruck

Opinion of the Court

THREADGILL, Chief Judge.

Sandra K. Roadruck, the former wife, appeals a final amended order for modification of child support on the ground that it was entered without an evidentiary hearing. We agree with the wife’s argument that there is no competent substantial evidence to support the court’s ruling.

Although an evidentiary hearing was scheduled and attended on February 17, 1992, no evidence was taken. Both parties requested a continuance which the court granted. Nevertheless, on November 20, 1992, the court entered an amended order for child support, which is the subject of this appeal.

We therefore reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.