Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Bruno v. State

Bruno v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 30, 1996 · Altenbernd, Lazzara, Quince
679 So. 2d 56; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9244; 1996 WL 492174 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bruno v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Benji Bruno challenges his sentence as well as certain conditions of probation and costs imposed after his conviction for burglary. We affirm his sentence and the conditions of probation. The state agrees the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), was not orally pronounced at sentencing and no statutory authority was given for the imposition of the $25.00 administrative cost. Therefore, we remand this ease to the trial court with instructions to strike these costs from the judgment and sentence. In all other re*57spects the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.