Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

M.T.C. v. State

M.T.C. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 6, 1996 · Cobb, Goshorn, Peterson
679 So. 2d 67; 1996 WL 502108 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

M.T.C. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm M.T.C.’s adjudication and disposition. However, in so doing, we strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the court failed to apprise the juvenile or his parents of their right to contest the amount as required by rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. On remand, the fee may be reimposed upon compliance with the rule. *68See, e.g., Green v. State, 650 So.2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑