Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Slocum v. State

Slocum v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 11, 1996 · No. 95-2133 · Dell, Klein, Pariente
679 So. 2d 359; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668; 1996 WL 512050 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Slocum v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and with the exception of the trial court’s imposition of a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of a firearm, we affirm the sentences imposed. The state concedes and we agree that the imposition of a three-year mandatory minimum sentence must be reversed for lack of a jury finding that appellant used or carried a firearm during the commission of the offenses. See State v. Tripp, 642 So.2d 728 (Fla. 1994); State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 1984).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

DELL, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.